Today's hottest deals

Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 07:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 145
57% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 221
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia L4
Nvidia(10DE 16EE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2040 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 552.74
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 215
Parallax 192
139% 193 fps
MRender 281
Gravity 157
Splatting 161
158% 200 fps
Poor: 137%
This bench: 137%
Great: 140%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
nvme_card-pd 54GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 154 154 154 154 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
Read 164
Write 164
Mixed 326
SusWrite 154
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 11
41% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 14.3
12% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 21 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback