Today's hottest deals

Lenovo FA495SIT22

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo FA495SIT22  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO FA495SIT22
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime15.4 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 00:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 191
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 501
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5125) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.97% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 17.3
9% 12.5 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 8.7
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.97%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 427 427 433 432 431 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,493
Write 1,583
Mixed 1,194
SusWrite 504
268% 1,194 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 53.6
184% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 831
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 664
491% 656 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 177%
Great: 237%
NE-1TB 1TB
601GB free
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 319 76 358 407 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 393
Mixed 400
SusWrite 316
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 18.6
119% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 540
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 312
270% 404 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93%
Great: 270%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 KingBank 8GB-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 25.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FA495SIT22 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo FA495SIT22

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback