Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 12:14
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 143
57% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 569
48% 417 Pts
64-Core 1,235
76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 82.8
43% 64.9 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 57.5
Splatting 43.9
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 239 242 237 238 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 426
Write 370
Mixed 332
SusWrite 244
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 30.3
100% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 183
136% 181 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 124%
WDC WD60EDAZ-11U78B0 6TB
247GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 29 33 49 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.04% Terrible
Read 96.7
Write 82.5
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 34.1
15% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 0.9
10% 4.33 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 40%
Seagate ST8000DM002-1YW112 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 118 112 113 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 8.7
Write 101
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 111
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.1
135% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 94%
WD Elements 25A3 2TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 116 117 111 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 157
Write 128
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 114
156% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 150 146 149 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 86.2
Write 97.8
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 148
144% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
239% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.3% Good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 17
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $603
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback