Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DB75EN
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 06:41
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 167
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 455
45% 369 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(107D 2746) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 13.6
16% 18.4 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 12.9
11% 13 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$33
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 415
Write 366
Mixed 180
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 9.6
53% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 84.9
DQ Mixed 35.9
44% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
32GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 108 112 124 128 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 102
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 112
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
794GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 30.4
Write 22.6
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 24.5
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.4
257% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback