HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 21:22
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 176
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 302
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 850C) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.57 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH240HAHQ-00005 240GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXT7904Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 313 313 315 311 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 448
Write 315
Mixed 359
SusWrite 312
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 30.6
95% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 86.2
73% 111 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
290GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 66 64 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 58
Write 62.1
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 64.8
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-081.A00LF Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback