PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Medion H67H2-EM (all builds) |
Motherboard | MEDION H67H2-EM |
Memory | 15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110922 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 07 '23 at 12:09 |
Run Duration | 235 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
|
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 393 412 442 448 448 MB/s
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$86
488GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 80 80 79 MB/s
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
39.3%
Below average
|
||||
H/W RAID 1 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 010E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.8 7 6.7 MB/s
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s
|
||||
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
206GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 MB/s
|
||||
Asmt ASM1156-PM 6TB
787GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 MB/s
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.6 4 MB/s
|
9.3%
Terrible
|
|||
H/W RAID 1 6TB
676GB free
Firmware: 010E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.8 6.9 7 6.9 6.9 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston SNA-DC/U 240GB
192GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.5 6.6 MB/s
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
47.4%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 42x |
Core i5-2320Intel $142Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 3x |
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 5x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $232 |