Today's hottest deals

Medion H67H2-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion H67H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H67H2-EM
Memory15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 12:09
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 161
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 412
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 38.2
36% 41.1 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 27.5
28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 393 412 442 448 448 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 435
Mixed 424
SusWrite 406
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 39.5
118% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 289
223% 303 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$86
488GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 75.1
Write 85
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 79.1
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 75%
WD Re 2TB-$30
596GB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 73.4
Mixed 64
SusWrite 69.3
51% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 83%
H/W RAID 1 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 010E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.8 7 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 50.8
Write 26.4
Mixed 24
SusWrite 6.8
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.8
237% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 125%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
206GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 6TB
787GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 26.5
Mixed 28
SusWrite 3.5
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
224% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 102%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.6 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.3% Terrible
Read 27.4
Write 27.7
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 3.7
16% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.3%
Great: 105%
H/W RAID 1 6TB
676GB free
Firmware: 010E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.8 6.9 7 6.9 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 53.4
Write 28.8
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 6.9
22% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 111%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 240GB
192GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.5 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 55.2
Write 25.5
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 6.5
32% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 6.9
321% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67H2-EM Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion H67H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $232
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback