QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory14.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14.9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.1 GB free of 14.9004 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 15:48
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC-Rome
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 61
1-Core 112
2-Core 220
71% 131 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 601
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
AMD(1002 0A34) ≥ 4GB
Driver: 20.10.25.07
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.4% Average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 84.3
41% 62.9 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 48.8
39% 46.9 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,071
Write 2,393
Mixed 2792
2,076% 2,752 MB/s
4K Read 73.3
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 60
10,847% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 306
2,956% 340 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 41.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 30.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback