Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HD R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 00:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 373
52% 382 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13002.23
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 21.6
13% 17.2 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 14.1
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green M.2 2280 240G 240GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42048100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 119 121 129 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68% Good
Read 445
Write 308
Mixed 363
SusWrite 153
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 31.3
107% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 36.3
62% 124 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68%
Great: 75%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 116 116 118 117 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 133
Write 99.3
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 115
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
228% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P26KC4U1-BADS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 25.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HD R4.0 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback