Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 13:44
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 106
44% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 150
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E20) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6
Parallax 11.2
5% 7.87 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SWR128G-001HL 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 240
Write 113
Mixed 53.5
29% 136 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 8.6
40% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 12.8
10% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 81%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 186
Write 164
Mixed 91.8
109% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.8
Write 8.7
Mixed 8.2
15% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.9
127% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P26KC4U1-BADS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.4% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback