Today's hottest deals

Pcware APM-A320G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcware APM-A320G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE APM-A320G
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 13:22
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 71.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 254
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 700
76% 600 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 31.1
19% 23.2 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 15.9
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SWR128G-001HL 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 196 118 110 104 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 423
Write 301
Mixed 364
SusWrite 152
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 38.5
140% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 186
163% 241 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P26KC4U1-BADS 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 21.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 24.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 18.5" 1280 720 SAM0B07 S19C301
Typical APM-A320G Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware APM-A320G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback