Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 05:04
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 109
46% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 175
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 23.2
14% 22.7 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 17
Splatting 25.4
19% 22.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SWR128G-001HL 128GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 5 113 103 38 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 291
Write 286
Mixed 299
SusWrite 70.8
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 22.8
85% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 182
154% 222 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
886GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 179 172 177 177 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 160
Mixed 104
SusWrite 176
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P26KC4U1-BADS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 16 0 31.5" 1280 720 MEIC313 Panasonic-TV
Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback