Asus PRIME A520M-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-A II  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 09:41
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$173
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 176
2-Core 348
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,038
106% 855 Pts
64-Core 1,558
96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.2% Above average
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 137
Parallax 284
0% 140 fps
MRender 235
Gravity 149
Splatting 200
159% 195 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-256 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 79 77 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 482
Write 329
Mixed 324
SusWrite 120
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 37
152% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 185
160% 236 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 Crucial BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Crucial BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.1% Very good
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 30.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 30.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A520M-A II Builds (Compare 511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback