bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 03:10
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 122
46% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 226
25% 196 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K260Q
Nvidia(10DE 101B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 370.41
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 26
Parallax 30.7
20% 27.3 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 24.1
22% 27.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 137GB
128GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 123 122 120 121 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.8% Poor
Read 24.5
Write 221
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 119
27% 116 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 10.7
32% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 68.7
DQ Write 37.9
DQ Mixed 53.2
40% 53.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 84%
Vmware Virtual disk 69GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 122 124 117 121 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 26
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback