Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z590 Phantom Gaming 4/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z590 Phantom Gaming 4/ac  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 17:28
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 292
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 866
78% 659 Pts
64-Core 1039
64% 1039 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 171
Parallax 366
143% 238 fps
MRender 306
Gravity 131
Splatting 200
171% 212 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,339
Write 1,560
Mixed 1318
315% 1,406 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 61
212% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 983
740% 998 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 362
Mixed 367
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 20.1
98% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 33.1
82% 166 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 109%
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB
2GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.2
8% 7.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Cuso YX4U3200E18081C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 19.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z590 Phantom Gaming 4/ac Builds (Compare 303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 Phantom Gaming 4/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback