Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '23 at 10:47
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6560U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 109
52% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 168
19% 149 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 4.3
3% 4 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 4.1
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sm400 M.2 2280-1TB SSD 1TB
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 312 305 294 273 298 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.3% Good
Read 395
Write 329
Mixed 316
SusWrite 295
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 17.4
74% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 37.7
75% 149 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IND-DDR4-16G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 11.2
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback