Today's hottest deals

Asrock AB350M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 17:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 144
53% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 521
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 500GB
70GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 140 146 136 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 126%
Adata SU630 240GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c87
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 109 115 90 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 294
Write 226
Mixed 241
SusWrite 94.9
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 16.2
63% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 179
132% 170 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 101%
Maxtor 6Y160M0 160GB-$117
25GB free
Firmware: YAR51HW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 46.8
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 43.3
32% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3266 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M-HDV Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback