Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Memory 19.1 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 35.2 19% 30.7 Pts	4-Core 66.6 8-Core 65.2 9% 65.9 Pts	64-Core 66 4% 66 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.48% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.48% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IM256-P130 256GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQJ1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 372 377 371 117 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.8% Above average	Read 328 Write 362 Mixed 323 SusWrite 273 73% 322 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 19.9 64% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 117 91% 126 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x16GB 6,485 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	14% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.37 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.3 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 328 12% 328 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	495x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	486x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	467x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,379x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	494x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	357x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87