Today's hottest deals

Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 550XCJ/550XCR  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XCJ-KF1BR
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 19:39
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 16.9
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 187
44% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 295
35% 270 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C834) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 5.4
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 7.8
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 238 262 178 221 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.2% Poor
Read 101
Write 63.3
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 222
24% 104 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 5.6
18% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 344
12% 344 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550XCJ/550XCR Builds (Compare 603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback