GPD G1618-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGPD G1618-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1618-04
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230302
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '23 at 00:38
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 63.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 317
80% 160 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 919
94% 757 Pts
64-Core 1098
68% 1098 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.5% Poor
Lighting 31.1
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 62.4
25% 44.2 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 17.7
20% 25.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
588GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 1203 89 85 396 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,897
Write 3968
Mixed 1,172
SusWrite 427
421% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 6
117% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 168
178% 312 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 151%
Great: 530%
Generic MassStorageClass 1TB
172GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 6.6 9.3 27 14 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 160
Write 93.5
Mixed 82
SusWrite 19.9
105% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 5
322% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9JCNNNFA5MLCR-N6E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.6% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 32.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 24.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 6" 1296 759 GPD0598 G1618-04
Typical G1618-04 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: GPD G1618-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback