GPD G1618-04

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGPD G1618-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1618-04
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 23:04
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 66
1-Core 167
2-Core 313
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 879
88% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$530
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 212
Parallax 217
196% 223 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 159
Splatting 130
140% 178 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 162%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480Y2D100-1TB 1TB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.5E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,324
Write 2,136
Mixed 1,582
379% 1,681 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 58.5
222% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 246
386% 740 MB/s
Poor: 167% Great: 339%
Generic MassStorageClass 513GB
148GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 88.9
137% 108 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.6
252% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9JCNNNFA5MLCR-N6E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 40.2
117% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 28
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G1618-04 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: GPD G1618-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback