Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2224G 363 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	49% Average	Memory 46.4 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 152 53% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 324 40% 308 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P630 593 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 095B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.93% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 7.9 4% 5.87 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 9.9 6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.93% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAJ20104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 185 276 283 173 175 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 319 Write 230 Mixed 265 SusWrite 229 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 13.8 54% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 106 100% 156 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9ASF1G72AZ-3G2E2 1x8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 6.4 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 2.7 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics P630IntelBench 6%, 593 samples	58x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)WD $59Bench 201%, 14,978 samples	8x
Raid 1 Volume 228GBIntelBench 79%, 111 samples	3x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $72Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	3x

RAM
M391A1K43BB2-CTD 1x8GBUnknownBench 47%, 68 samples	10x
HMA81GU7CJR8N-VK 1x8GBUnknownBench 45%, 40 samples	5x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 4x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 188 samples	5x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $59