Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 11:12
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 172
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 483
49% 398 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77% Very good
Lighting 98.5
Reflection 108
Parallax 93.3
80% 99.8 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 72.4
71% 88.8 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77%
Great: 105%
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 99.7
Parallax 5.4
5% 36.9 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.8
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 813
Write 1,338
Mixed 856
226% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 44
139% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 658
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 622
459% 606 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C15S4/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 9.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 16,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback