Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 324 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 56.8 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 158 55% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 366 40% 319 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% EVGA(3842 2753) CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 19.4 Parallax 18.7 16% 19.4 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 21.2 Splatting 17.5 17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72 92,081 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 956 941 938 955 950 957 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 947 Write 922 Mixed 953 SusWrite 949 213% 943 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 40.1 131% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 509 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 450 323% 421 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 295%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 2x31.5GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 24 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.7% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 16 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	49x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x

RAM
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	234x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	138x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	90x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130