Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCasper Casper Nirvana Notebook
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130824
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 09 '17 at 08:43
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 162
70% 114 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 233
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Elitegroup(1019 999C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.23
Parallax 9.06
6% 8.26 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 8.53
Splatting 8.87
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Esa3asa2 PSTBT120GB 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0114 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 375
Write 377
Mixed 316
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 6.02
63% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.9
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 1.29
37% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
1TB free
Firmware: GT001M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 82.9
Write 83.7
Mixed 84.4
63% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.26
78% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64C88B0NS-DI 1315 CT25664BF160B.C8FE 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $492Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback