Medion E14411

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E14411  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION SF40CM
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 20:02
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 35.9
1-Core 94
2-Core 124
47% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 146
21% 152 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A03B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 7.7
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SM8256GPKTCB4BECS-S11L2 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 115 115 89 74 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 286
Write 205
Mixed 233
SusWrite 106
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 9.8
37% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 135
113% 163 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.9
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E14411 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E14411

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback