Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V16.7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.7  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.7
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211119
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 15:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 38.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 270
77% 153 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 650
61% 509 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 5015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 53
Parallax 5.5
4% 21.2 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 8.3
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$83
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 1052 1029 1062 1067 1067 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,071
Write 1,051
Mixed 966
SusWrite 1,047
233% 1,034 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 71.6
255% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 929
DQ Mixed 508
430% 608 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 215%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO416F82-3200E 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.8% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 5.2
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.7 Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback