Today's hottest deals

Notebook NP5x_60_7x_RNx1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemNotebook NP5x_60_7x_RNx1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NP5x_60_7x_RNx1
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230511
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '24 at 22:07
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 41.8
1-Core 198
2-Core 398
104% 212 Pts
4-Core 747
8-Core 1,091
115% 919 Pts
64-Core 1,812
112% 1,812 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A552) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.97 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 0.8
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD Blue SN570 500GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 761 368 382 321 379 381 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,953
Write 2,067
Mixed 1,675
SusWrite 432
343% 1,532 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 68.6
274% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 991
DQ Write 1,057
DQ Mixed 1,010
764% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 233%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO416F82-3200E 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 17.2" 1280 720 CMN175C
Typical NP5x_60_7x_RNx1 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Notebook NP5x_60_7x_RNx1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback