Today's hottest deals

Tulpar T7 V20.6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemTulpar T7 V20.6  (all builds)
MotherboardTULPAR T7 V20.6
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '24 at 17:37
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 73
1-Core 203
2-Core 405
116% 227 Pts
4-Core 792
8-Core 1,305
128% 1,048 Pts
64-Core 1,948
121% 1,948 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1295) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 30.7
21% 29.2 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 24.1
24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU010TZ 1TB
919GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,303
Write 1,878
Mixed 1,172
326% 1,451 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 74
252% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 755
533% 687 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 365%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
9GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39
Write 7
Mixed 8
17% 18 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22/16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 18.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 144 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0823
Typical T7 V20.6 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO

System: Tulpar T7 V20.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback