Gigabyte B360M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte B360M H  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '23 at 13:34
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 237
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 614
69% 543 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3714) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 114
Parallax 105
88% 109 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 105
Splatting 99.6
82% 99.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 250GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 0.4 5.4 39 27 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 394
Write 322
Mixed 286
SusWrite 25.4
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 9.2
50% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 32.7
DQ Mixed 12.8
13% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
221GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 2.7 11 46 32 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 438
Write 363
Mixed 294
SusWrite 29.7
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 18.8
74% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 64.6
DQ Mixed 28.8
37% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 55%
Ccboot iSCSI 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 2.7 11 45 32 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 357
Write 251
Mixed 274
SusWrite 29.3
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 13.6
58% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 36.8
DQ Mixed 15.9
15% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.D1GS7.AUB0B 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M H Builds (Compare 1,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360M H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback