Today's hottest deals

Dell System XPS L702X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell System XPS L702X  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XN71K
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 08:04
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 58
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 67.3
33% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 127
15% 118 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Dell(1028 04B8) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EXRAM 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 350 257 107 131 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 373
Write 369
Mixed 312
SusWrite 205
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 16.6
66% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 86.4
79% 119 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$73
372GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 120
Write 39.1
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 36.5
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Transcend TS1GSK64V6H 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System XPS L702X Builds (Compare 628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell System XPS L702X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback