Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 02:35
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 225
69% 131 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 296
41% 304 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 20.3
11% 15.4 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 13.9
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DTS6256 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 357 380 408 281 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.6% Very good
Read 408
Write 380
Mixed 313
SusWrite 317
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 14.6
118% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 19.5
76% 164 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 13.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback