Asus P7P55D-E EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E EVO (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100827
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '23 at 04:05
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 880 808 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 144 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 334 35% 282 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% EVGA(3842 3687) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.44 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 34.4 Reflection 32.9 Parallax 46 28% 37.8 fps	MRender 46 Gravity 44.2 Splatting 37.6 34% 42.6 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB 31,107 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c86 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 124 126 131 131 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34% Below average	Read 150 Write 126 Mixed 130 SusWrite 125 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 25 4K Mixed 18.2 61% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 18.4 DQ Write 39.6 DQ Mixed 24.7 20% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 99%
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S70 B 1TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 353% 593GB free Firmware: 3.2.F.66 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 981 1082 1103 1165 1168 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,041 Write 1,147 Mixed 1030 SusWrite 1028 240% 1,061 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 47 152% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 478 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 353 263% 355 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 530%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB 2,637 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2TB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 20.2 Mixed 2.7 9% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 20% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 17.5 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E EVO Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	13x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	7x
Core i7 880IntelBench 71%, 808 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
2TB SSD 2TB3Bench 85%, 1,800 samples	2x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	13x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	7x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $678

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16