Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1502ZA
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 09:01
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 47.3
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 120
42% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 407
38% 318 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1D52) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1369
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 13.8
8% 13.1 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 14.9
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 414 354 362 355 480 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 922
Write 531
Mixed 526
SusWrite 408
133% 597 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 24.8
87% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 236
174% 232 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback