Intel NUC12WSBi5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC12WSKi5
MotherboardIntel NUC12WSBi5  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '24 at 11:18
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 69.9
1-Core 172
2-Core 331
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 943
93% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,415
88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 3024) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 21.9
16% 21.5 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 16.3
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 892 343 221 217 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 629
Write 848
Mixed 644
SusWrite 461
146% 645 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 48.2
172% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 578
405% 521 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 128%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 37
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 22.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 5 60 27" 1280 720 DEL407F DELL U2713HM
Typical NUC12WSBi5 Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC12WSBi5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback