Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 14:08
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 109
2-Core 197
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 487
53% 422 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 31.3
18% 23.5 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 15.7
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV240TCB 240GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D0DE006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 226 236 243 242 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 347
Write 231
Mixed 197
SusWrite 236
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 22.7
79% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 206
165% 230 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 85%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
2TB free
Firmware: 00.0NS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 97 118 128 129 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 69.1
Write 128
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 120
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 57 83 95 80 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 136
Write 101
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 82.6
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 27.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $331
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback