Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8214
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170524
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 07:18
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 53
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 91.4
38% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 195
22% 174 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 8214) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 5.9
4% 6.57 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 8.5
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
10GB free
Firmware: 52008100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 319
Write 292
Mixed 323
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 17.4
54% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 4.5
85% 203 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 111%
Sandisk SD8SNAT-128G-1006 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2311006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 125 126 140 155 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 228
Write 123
Mixed 126
SusWrite 130
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.4
323% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 9,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback