Arcelik GNB 15xx B1 Serisi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemArcelik GNB 15xx B1 Serisi  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta TWD
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 21:54
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Memory 41.5
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 81.6
34% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 142
17% 133 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Quanta(152D 1054) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 512GB SSD
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DHHR411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 280 325 313 316 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 233
Write 310
Mixed 239
SusWrite 305
62% 272 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 10.6
40% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 73.5
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 144
115% 154 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GNB 15xx B1 Serisi Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Arcelik GNB 15xx B1 Serisi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback