Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 05:01
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 183
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 274
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Asus(1043 843F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 512GB SSD
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1020A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 55 6.6 5.6 5 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 451
Write 374
Mixed 359
SusWrite 59.2
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 5.6
55% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 42.5
74% 140 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AID38G16C11UBD Kingston 99U5471-038.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 13 60 32 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0A31 S22C350
Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback