Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T3300KA
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220817
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 18:35
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 40
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 106
40% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 123
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D02) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.73 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 7
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G-1002 256GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 127 163 150 158 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 308
Write 211
Mixed 203
SusWrite 155
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 8.3
27% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.9
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback