Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive404% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171003
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 15:36
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$334
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 62.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 230
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 891
79% 667 Pts
64-Core 2,352
146% 2,352 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 189
Parallax 189
103% 168 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 168
Splatting 128
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.0
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
404% Outstanding
Read 3,306
Write 3,716
Mixed 3,000
748% 3,340 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 33.8
125% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 63.2
75% 130 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 404%
Great: 448%
Amd-raid Array 2 998GB
867GB free
Firmware: 9.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
635% Outstanding
Read 5,787
Write 6,015
Mixed 4,320
1,199% 5,374 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 26.3
107% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 74
61% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 635%
Great: 635%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: FJ1M Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 149
Write 147
Mixed 149
112% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.57
162% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85%
Great: 112%
USB3.0 USB3.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.3% Very poor
Read 83.8
Write 18.3
Mixed 20.6
39% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.77
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.37
57% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
Intenso Rainbow Line 4GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 5.71
Mixed 6.79
11% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.05
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.005
15% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 53.3
MC Mixed 49.5
146% 51.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 20.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 128%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,031
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback