Asus M11AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M11AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M11AD
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130815
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 10:54
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 295
37% 283 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
EVGA(3842 1257) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 51.6
47% 54.6 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 45.5
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 365
Write 406
Mixed 287
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 27.8
102% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 253
209% 298 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
268GB free
Firmware: CC47
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 171
Write 109
Mixed 78.8
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
27GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.1
Write 13.4
Mixed 18.2
35% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.8
131% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MI64C1D1629Z1 1302 PSD38G16002 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 18.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 13 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7017 SAMSUNG
Typical M11AD Builds (Compare 493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M11AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $144
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback