Today's hottest deals

Asus H310I-IM-A R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus H310I-IM-A R3.0  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H310I-IM-A R3.0
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 12:42
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 169
56% 103 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 244
31% 237 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 7.3
4% 5.6 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 10.5
4% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
240gb SATA Flash Drive 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SFMB6110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 18 3.1 131 180 175 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 229
Write 229
Mixed 156
SusWrite 109
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 13.1
47% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 128
103% 146 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B2GG5.4000B 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.2% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 9% 43 24 0 60 23" 1920 1080 HPN345F HP E233
Typical H310I-IM-A R3.0 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus H310I-IM-A R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback