Today's hottest deals

Acer ACRPRDCT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAcer ACRPRDCT  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_HW
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 20:12
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 103
47% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 147
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 079B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 5.3
2% 3.43 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 15 12 117 75 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.5% Poor
Read 139
Write 82.9
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 93.1
22% 99 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 10.1
41% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR6A-PB RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 13.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 32 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO31EC
Typical ACRPRDCT Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer ACRPRDCT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback