Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_HW
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 09:27
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 88.4
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 114
59% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 176
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Acer(1025 079B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 16.9
16% 17.6 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 14.8
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 120GB-$91
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT43B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 97 55 38 38 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 401
Write 359
Mixed 291
SusWrite 86.8
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 25.6
83% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 167
137% 195 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 104%
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139
88GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 123 133 84 126 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 413
Write 328
Mixed 319
SusWrite 138
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 21.2
71% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 178
139% 192 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR6A-PB RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-573G Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback