Today's hottest deals

Alldocube i1405T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAlldocube i1405T  (all builds)
MotherboardALLDOCUBE ALLDOCUBE
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 09:20
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Memory 33.9
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 28.8
21% 30.5 Pts
4-Core 43
8-Core 54.2
6% 48.6 Pts
64-Core 63.3
4% 63.3 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.7
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 3.5
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NT-256 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 281 288 296 306 241 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 359
Write 347
Mixed 335
SusWrite 287
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 19.9
64% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 83.6
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 93
65% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 6 0 14" 1280 720 BOE09DE
Typical i1405T Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Alldocube i1405T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback