PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3397 |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190410 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 05 '23 at 17:25 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
59.1%
Above average
|
62% 108 Pts
|
36% 273 Pts
|
18% 299 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26%
Poor
|
27% 33.6 fps
|
24% 30.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() btoS560s 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0712B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 112 38 27 49 46 MB/s
|
34.6%
Below average
|
47% 214 MB/s
|
46% 15.1 MB/s
|
10% 16.6 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
192GB free
Firmware: HP22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 115 114 119 120 121 MB/s
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
71% 96.3 MB/s
|
162% 1.13 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
746GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 139 130 135 140 140 MB/s
|
81.1%
Excellent
|
92% 126 MB/s
|
188% 1.43 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.3%
Above average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
41% 97.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
43% | 31% | 35 | 215 | 60 | 60 | 24" | 1920 1080 | ONN0101 100002487 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 2,486x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,473x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 801x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1,932x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 729x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 493x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |