Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170M-E D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170M-E D3  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 15:56
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 178
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 292
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.4% Good
Lighting 80.9
Reflection 101
Parallax 61.1
66% 81 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 79.3
Splatting 70.8
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 510GB
228GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1067 1229 782 822 814 807 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 115%
Samsung 830 64GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 157
Mixed 206
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 18.4
75% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 54.6
DQ Mixed 90.4
86% 140 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 63%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 61GB
1GB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 156
Mixed 194
56% 259 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 15.5
72% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 50
DQ Mixed 76.3
78% 132 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-U8G-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1640 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1920 1017 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical Z170M-E D3 Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-E D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback