HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '23 at 21:03
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 178 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 340 45% 339 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3396) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.35% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 1.9 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.35% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 120GB SSD 73 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.15.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 63 61 65 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 360 Write 67.5 Mixed 96.7 SusWrite 56.4 31% 145 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 17.5 72% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 19.8 50% 104 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 429GB free Firmware: MS1OA7S0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 159 160 159 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Read 152 Write 152 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 159 90% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB 1,368 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.4% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 8.1 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	29	23	60	19"	1280 971	DEL4047 DEL 1908FPBLK

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,041x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	965x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	400x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	380x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16