Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac  (all builds)
Memory70.5 GB free of 80 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 03:23
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 877
89% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,000
62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 191
Parallax 210
173% 204 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 165
Splatting 124
152% 196 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 153%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$230
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 343 403 432 433 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 368
Mixed 384
SusWrite 380
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 30.2
112% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 278
225% 319 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 90%
Great: 133%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0905
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 143 143 143 142 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 142
Write 142
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 141
146% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 79GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 8192, 32767, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 24.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 160 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7768 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac Builds (Compare 1,671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback