Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	358% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 1,015 User benchmarks, average bench 84% FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Memory 64.1 1-Core 178 2-Core 355 102% 199 Pts	4-Core 696 8-Core 1,020 107% 858 Pts	64-Core 1,668 103% 1,668 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Legend(17AA 3801) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.12.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56% Above average	Lighting 66 Reflection 21 Parallax 99.2 54% 62.1 fps	MRender 20.3 Gravity 83.3 Splatting 102 60% 68.7 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg80znv1t02 LS KIOXIA 1TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 358% 701GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4106APLS SusWrite @10s intervals: 3315 3319 3552 1644 1465 1486 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	358% Outstanding	Read 2,252 Write 3,262 Mixed 2,247 SusWrite 2,464 579% 2,556 MB/s	4K Read 56.8 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 76.2 256% 89.7 MB/s	DQ Read 976 DQ Write 734 DQ Mixed 906 664% 872 MB/s
Poor: 248% ↑ This bench: 358% Great: 419%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 262GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 38,137 Mixed 1,051 4,070% 19594 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 67.2 242% 85.9 MB/s	DQ Read 596 DQ Write 830 DQ Mixed 272 329% 566 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2.5TB free, PID 0905 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 44 46 46 50 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 60.9 Write 57.3 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 45.2 58% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N HMCG78AGBSA092N 32GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 144% 5600, 5600 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	120% Outstanding	MC Read 49.8 MC Write 34.2 MC Mixed 49.7 127% 44.6 GB/s	SC Read 35.5 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 42.8 101% 35.4 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 162%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	49	13	240	16"	1280 720	CSO161B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 105%

UFO

CPU
Ryzen 7 7840HSAMDBench 84%, 1,015 samples	12x

GPU
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples	7x
Radeon 780MAMDBench 36%, 1,815 samples	3x

SSD
LS KIOXIA 1TBKxg80znv1t02Bench 358%, 42 samples	5x
PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1101 1TBWDBench 360%, 265 samples	4x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TBSamsungBench 363%, 10,270 samples	1x

RAM
HMCG78AGBSA095N HMCG78AGBSA092N 32GBHynixBench 144%, 75 samples	5x
HMCG78AGBSA092N 1x16GBHynixBench 76%, 395 samples	2x
HMCG78AGBSA092N Micron MT60B2G8HB-56B ES:G 32GBHynixBench 144%, 8 samples	2x